Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

ZHANG v. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 332 Fed.Appx. 156 (4th Cir. 2009)

ZHENLU ZHANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; Computer Sciences Corporation; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; J.C. Miller, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-1715.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: September 10, 2009.
Decided: September 14, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-01716-DKC).

Zhenlu Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. C. Dennis Southard, IV, Thompson Hine, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Larry Robert Seegull, DLA Piper U.S. LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zhenlu Zhang appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration after imposition of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Zhang’s motions to recuse and for sanctions, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zhang v. Science Technology Corp., No. 8:08-cv-01716-DKC (D. Md. May 21 June 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle