Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. SILLS, 419 Fed.Appx. 315 (4th Cir. 2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Edward SILLS, a/k/a Bobby, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6048.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: March 15, 2011.
Decided: March 21, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5).

Robert Edward Sills, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Edward Sills appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion in which he sought a reduction to his sentence. We have reviewed

Page 316

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. united States v. Sills, No. 2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D.Va. Nov. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle