Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. ROMILUS, 376 Fed.Appx. 323 (4th Cir. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Baltasaras ROMILUS, a/k/a Haitian Bill, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7324.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.April 13, 2010.
April 29, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-F-15).

Baltasaras Romilus, Appellant pro se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Page 324

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Baltasaras Romilus appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court’s conclusion that Romilus was not eligible for a sentence reduction because he was found responsible for more than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Romilus, No. 5:94-cr-00097-F-15 (E.D.N.C. July 13, 2009). We deny Romilus’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle