Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. PENA, 286 Fed.Appx. 40 (4th Cir. 2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Domingo Nolberto PENA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6918.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: July 31, 2008.
Decided: August 11, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00132-JCC-11).

Domingo Nolberto Pena, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Rudolph Parker, Jr., James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Page 41

PER CURIAM:

Domingo Nolberto Pena appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pena, No. 1:98-cr-00132-JCC-11 (E.D.Va. May 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle