Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. KNOX, 301 Fed.Appx. 267 (4th Cir. 2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don Eddlon KNOX, a/k/a D, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6982.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: November 20, 2008.
Decided: November 26, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,

Page 267

at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior This case was not selected for publication District Judge. (3:97-cr-00262-RLW-ll).

Don Eddlon Knox, Appellant Pro Se.

John Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Don Eddlon Knox appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Knox, No. 3:97-cr-00262-RLW-ll (E.D.Va. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle