Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. JACKSON, 289 Fed.Appx. 660 (4th Cir. 2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arnold Lloyd JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6490.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: August 14, 2008.
Decided: August 20, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13).

Arnold Lloyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arnold Lloyd Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court United States v. Jackson, No. 5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13 (W.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

Page 661

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle