Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. HENDRICKS, 357 Fed.Appx. 536 (4th Cir. 2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chalmers Lavette HENDRICKS, a/k/a Champ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7915.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: December 15, 2009.
Decided: December 22, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger

Page 537

District Judge. (3:94-cr-00030-MR-GCM-4).

Chalmers Lavette Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chalmers Lavette Hendricks appeals a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Hendricks was not entitled to a reduction because even with the benefit of Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his Guidelines range of imprisonment remained the same. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the; materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle