Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. HARROD, 393 Fed.Appx. 121 (4th Cir. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darry Marvin HARROD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-8198.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: August 26, 2010.
Decided: August 31, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Page 122

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00060-RDB).

Darry Marvin Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darry Marvin Harrod seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Motion for an Injunction and Other Relief. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Harrod seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

jdjungle