U.S. v. BRISCOE, 427 Fed.Appx. 250 (4th Cir. 2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donnell BRISCOE, a/k/a PR, a/k/a Bones, a/k/a P, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7652.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: April 28, 2011.
Decided: May 3, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:04-cr-00559-AW-1).

Richard Donnell Briscoe, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Donnell Briscoe appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Briscoe, No. 8:04-cr-00559-AW-1 (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.