Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

U.S. v. BEASLEY, 266 Fed.Appx. 256 (4th Cir. 2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Curtis A. BEASLEY, Defendant — Appellant.

No. 07-7441.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 21, 2008.
Decided: February 26, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:02-cr-01358-HMH).

Curtis A. Beasley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis A. Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Beasley’s motion was untimely filed. See
Fed.R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle