Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

STEELE v. MOTZ, 393 Fed.Appx. 115 (4th Cir. 2010)

Scott STEELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Frederick MOTZ, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-1006.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: August 26, 2010.
Decided: August 31, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Page 116

Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge, sitting by designation. (1:09-cv-O0792-FPS).

Scott Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Kidwell, Office of the United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Scott Steele appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the district court judge who presided over a prior action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Steele v. Motz, No. 1:09-cv-00792-FPS (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle