Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

SMITH v. U.S., 352 Fed.Appx. 779 (4th Cir. 2009)

Kevin Michael SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Dr. Patriba Chittra Medda, a/k/a Petriba Chittra Medda, a/k/a Chitra Medda, a/k/a Chiddra Medda, a/k/a Chittra Medda, VMAC Salisbury and Chrlotte Clinic 1601 Brenner Ave Salisbury, NC 28144, Defendant.

No. 09-1651.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: November 17, 2009.
Decided: November 19, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reid-(3:08-cv-00427-inger, District Judge. MR-DCK).

Kevin Michael Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sidney P. Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Michael Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Smith’s Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court Smith v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-00427-MR-DCK, 2009 WL 1564145 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2009). We grant Smith’s motion to supplement the record and deny the remainder of Smith’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Page 780

jdjungle