Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

SEKOH v. SEKOH, 398 Fed.Appx. 893 (4th Cir. 2010)

Danny Jan SEKOH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Linda Stricklen SEKOH; Shannon Poore, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1941.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: October 14, 2010.
Decided: October 20, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North

Page 894

Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00251-D).

Danny Jan Sekoh, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danny Jan Sekoh appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sekoh v. Sekoh, No. 5:10-cv-00251-D (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle