Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

OPOKU v. NAPOLITANO, 11-1169 (4th Cir. 10-21-2011)

GEORGE OSAM PINANKO; STELLA OPOKU, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; SARAH TAYLOR, Director, Washington District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-1169.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: October 12, 2011.
Decided: October 21, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge (1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ).

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Anna E. Cross, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Page 2

PER CURIAM:

George Osam Pinanko and Stella Opoku appeal the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their Petition for Writ of Mandamus or for Review of Agency Action under the Administrative Procedure Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeePinanko v. Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Page 1

jdjungle