Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

MORFAW v. HOLDER, 312 Fed.Appx. 535 (4th Cir. 2009)

Martin Agenda MORFAW, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-1249.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 9, 2009.
Decided: February 25, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Danielle Beach-Oswald, Amy M. Grander, Beach-Oswald Immigration Law Associates, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Patrick J. Bumatay, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin Agenda Morfaw, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Morfaw (B.I.A. Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Page 536

jdjungle