Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

McCULLOUGH v. U.S., 267 Fed.Appx. 303 (4th Cir. 2008)

George C. McCULLOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-2044.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: February 28, 2008.
Decided: March 3, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at

Page 304

Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-02104-GRA).

George C. McCullough, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George C. McCullough appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCullough v. United States, No. 8:07-cv-02104-GRA, 2007 WL 2979629
(D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle