Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

JOHNSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BD., 11-1138 (4th Cir. 9-7-2011)

CLIFFTON JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD, First Division, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-1138.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: August 24, 2011.
Decided: September 7, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge (1:10-cv-00776-WDQ).

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cliffton Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Page 2

PER CURIAM:

Cliffton Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151 (2006) et seq. for failure to state a clam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Nat’l R.R. AdjustmentBd., No. 1:10-cv-00776-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Page 1

jdjungle