Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

INMAN v. ASTRUE, 271 Fed.Appx. 360 (4th Cir. 2008)

Denise M. INMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-1208.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: March 19, 2008.
Decided: March 28, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Dennis L. Howell, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00021).

V. Lamar Gudger, III, Gudger Gudger, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretehen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Jason W. Valencia, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Page 361

PER CURIAM:

Denise M. Inman appeals the magistrate judge’s order[*] denying Inman’s motion for summary judgment, granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Inman disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Inman v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-00021 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

[*] The parties consented to have the case decided by a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

jdjungle