Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

DELESTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 11-7012 (4th Cir. 10-21-2011)

DWAYNE CURTIS DELESTON, a/k/a Dwayne Deleston, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; JACKSON SETH WHIPPER; MILLER WILLIAMS SHEALY, JR.; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-7012.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: October 18, 2011.
Decided: October 21, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge (6:10-cv-00444-DCN).

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Curtis Deleston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Page 2

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Curtis Deleston appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agentsof Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.Deleston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. 6:10-cv-00444-DCN (D.S.C. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Page 1

jdjungle