Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

COOPER v. PINKERTON, 249 Fed.Appx. 979 (4th Cir. 2007)

Carl Benit COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PINKERTON SECURITY, et al; Andrew John Savage, III, Esquire; Eduardo Kelvin Curry, Esquire; Michael S. Seekings, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-1252.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: September 17, 2007.
Decided: October 9, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:06-cv-01448-CMC).

Carl Benit Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Holmes Hood, Hood Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina; John A. Massalon, Wills Massalon, Charleston, South Carolina; Joseph Rutledge Young, III, Duffy Young, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Eduardo Kelvin Curry, Curry, Curry Counts, Charleston, South Carolina; Timothy William Bouch, Leath, Bouch Crawford, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Page 980

PER CURIAM:

Carl Benit Cooper appeals a district court order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his claim of a conspiracy among several parties ultimately resulting in his criminal convictions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Cooper v. Pinkerton, No. 4:06-cv-01448-CMC, 2007 WL 666799 (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle