No. 88-1571.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 22, 1989.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Robert R. Merhige, Jr., District Judge.
[1] Upon consideration of appellant’s pro se letter, which this Court has construed as a motion for reconsideration of the order denying the petition for rehearing, [2] IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion for reconsideration is granted, and the petition for rehearing in this case is granted. [3] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond, is hereby reversed. [4] Entered at the direction of Judge Russell, with the concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Chapman.Page 466
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2453 WEST VIRGINIA CWP…
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4299 UNITED STATES OF…
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1187 MARYAM BALBED, Plaintiff…
No. 15-1999. 845 F.3d 112 (2017) Brandon PEGG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Grant HERRNBERGER, individually and in…
No. 15-1899. 845 F.3d 104 (2016) CHAMPION PRO CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; Carl E. Carey, Jr.,…
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1800 In Re: GREGORY…