ALFORD v. PEERS, 428 Fed.Appx. 257 (4th Cir. 2011)


Carlos A. ALFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Celecia PEERS; Brian Mansfield; Good Shepard Ministries, Defendants-Appellees, and Katrina Knight; Verna Mansfield, Defendants.

No. 10-2246.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: April 28, 2011.
Decided: May 10, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00170-BO).

Carlos A. Alford, Appellant pro se. Harry Lee Davis, Jr., Ann Cox Rowe, Davis Hamrick, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Page 258

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos A. Alford appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. Peers, No. 7:09-cv-00170-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.