AKINRO v. HERTZ CAR RENTAL, 395 Fed.Appx. 1002 (4th Cir. 2010)


Francis AKINRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HERTZ CAR RENTAL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-1707.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: September 28, 2010.
Decided: October 1, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01297-JFM).

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental, No. 1:10-cv-01297-JFM (D. Md. June 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.