Categories: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

AKINRO v. BALTIMORE U.S. POST, 389 Fed.Appx. 328 (4th Cir. 2010)

Francis AKINRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE U.S. POST OFFICE POLICEMEN, et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-1580.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: July 22, 2010.
Decided: July 30, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01151-JFM).

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court Akinro v. Baltimore U.S. Post Office Policemen, No. 1:10-cv-01151-JFM (D.Md. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle