A.T.T. v. U.S., 302 Fed.Appx. 228 (4th Cir. 2008)


A.T.T., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Peter Gilcrest; Nathaniel P. Proctor; Yvonne Mims-Evans; Thomas C. Porter; Helms, Mullis Wicker PLLC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-1724.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.Submitted: November 10, 2008.
Decided: December 9, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00192-FDW).

A.T.T., a minor, Appellant Pro Se.

Page 229

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

A.T.T., a minor, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. A.T.T. v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-00192-FDW, 2008 WL 1944172 (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.